Neighbors in Ross shocked by number of dogs rescued from home | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Neighbors in Ross shocked by number of dogs rescued from home

Tony LaRussa
1665271_web1_ptr-RossDogsFolo1-091319
Tony LaRussa | Tribune-Review
Ross Township building inspector Howard Boyd posts a sign warning people not to enter a property along Ridgeside Road, where more than 100 dogs that were being hoarded were rescued by humane officers.
1665271_web1_ptr-RossDogsFolo2-091319
Tony LaRussa | Tribune-Review
Neighbors of a home on Ridgeside Road in Ross Township, where more than 100 dogs were rescued on Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2019, said junk piled up in the front yard led them to believe the woman living there was a “hoarder.” But they had no idea that so many animals were living in the modestly sized home.
1665271_web1_ptr-RossDogsFolo3-091319
Tony LaRussa | Tribune-Review
Nick Rickert, Ross Township’s director of community development, observes the property along Ridgeside Road where more than 100 dogs were rescued on Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2019. Rickert said steps are being taken to condemn the property.
1665271_web1_ptr-RossDogFolo4-091319
Tony LaRussa | Tribune-Review
The only visible sign that dogs lived in a home along Ridgeside Drive was a large kennel in the rear yard. But neighbors said they rarely saw dogs in the cage. On Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2019, more than 100 dogs were removed from the property by humane officers, who had to dress in protective gear because of the intense smell in the home.
1665271_web1_nj-RossDogsFolo5-091319
Tony LaRussa | Tribune-Review
Kate Tierney, who lives across the street from a home in Ross where more than 100 dogs were removed on Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2019, said the smell coming from the home on breezy days was unbearable, but she had no idea so many dogs were living on the property.
1665271_web1_ptr-rossdogsfoloaf2-091319
Natalie Miller | Tribune-Review
A female dog and her litter were receiving care at the Animal Friends facility in Ohio Township on Thursday, Sept. 12, 2019. The dogs were rescued from a home in Ross Township.
1665271_web1_ptr-rossdogsfoloaf1-091319
Natalie Miller | Tribune-Review
Dr. Jonna Swanson, a veterinarian at Animal Friends, inspects a female dog named Cricket on Thursday, Sept. 12, 2019. The dog was rescued from a home in Ross.

From the day Kate Tierney moved into her home along Ridgeside Road in Ross Township, she suspected there might be a hoarder living in the house across the street.

There was junk strewn in the front yard, and at least two dumpsters had been filled and removed from the modestly sized home.

On Thursday, Tierney said she had no idea that the woman living in the home was actually hoarding more than 100 dogs, according to authorities.

“I constantly heard barking, but I really couldn’t tell how many dogs were in there,” said Tierney, 24, who moved to the neighborhood about a year and a half ago. “I figured maybe there were 10 animals at the most. And because they were filling up the dumpsters, I felt like maybe they were at least trying to be good neighbors.”

While Tierney said she could smell an “almost overwhelming” stench emanating from the house “on breezy days,” it wasn’t enough to raise her suspicions about the number of animals in the house.

“I thought maybe there was a dead animal or something near our house,” she said.

On Wednesday evening, 117 dogs and puppies — mostly Australian Shepherd, Border Collie and Golden Retriever mixes — were rescued from the home, including some that humane officers described as “emaciated” and in need of immediate medical attention. They described some of the dogs as elderly.

The odor of ammonia in the house was so strong that rescuers could not enter without the protection of a breathing mask.

On Thursday morning, township code enforcement officers posted a sign warning people — including the homeowner and her adult son who lived there — not to enter the property, which was cordoned off by police tape.

Nick Rickert, the township’s community development director, said the municipality is proceeding with steps to have the property condemned.

The township issued a statement on Thursday saying it “has received complaints about this property from neighbors and concerned residents throughout the last several years, resulting in multiple citations, court hearings and rulings from the local magistrate.”

The rescued animals were taken to Animal Friends in Ohio Township, where staff and first responders worked until early Thursday to complete the intake process.

One puppy that was just a few days old died.

Another dog that had severe bites on its neck was transferred to Pittsburgh Veterinary Specialty and Emergency Center in the North Hills for treatment. It is in stable condition.

Some neighbors who live along Ridgeside Road say that while they were unaware that so many dogs were being kept in the home, problems with the property are not new.

Nancy Schlosser, 78, who lives next door to the house from which the dogs were rescued, said she was unaware of the sheer number of dogs living in the house, but she suspected they were not receiving proper care.

“I can hardly believe there were so many dogs in there, but I’m not surprised,” she said. “The smell was horrible and there were always flies swarming around. A couple of years ago, they were cited for having farm animals on the property. I really can’t tell you how happy I am that something is finally being done about it.”

Ross officials confirmed that the property’s owner, whose name was not released, was cited last year for having scores of cats, chickens, rabbits, ducks and even a goat on the property.

Schlosser, who has lived in the neighborhood for more than 50 years, said she hasn’t spoken to the woman who was hoarding the dogs “for many years.”

“I tried to be friendly with her when she first moved in, but then we found out that she was deliberately letting her dogs do their business on our lawn when we left our house,” she said. “When we confronted her, she just began screaming profanities at us. So, we left her alone.”

Steve Korbel, president of the Ross board of commissioners, said even if police or code enforcement officers respond to a complaint, they don’t necessarily have the authority to enter a property.

“We respond to all complaints, but we are constrained by the law,” he said.

Mary Withrow, executive director of Pittsburgh Aviation Animal Rescue, which assisted with the case on Wednesday, said her organization has worked on animal hoarding cases across the country “but this is definitely one of the worst I’ve ever seen.”

Withrow said cracking down on animal hoarders often can be difficult.

“Just because an officer goes to the house doesn’t mean the owner is going to let you in,” she said, noting that on previous visits to the house in Ross “we only saw four dogs, and they did not look neglected.”

Withrow said searching a property requires a warrant issued by a judge “who is going to want to see proof that abuse or neglect is taking place.”

Shannon Powers, a spokeswoman for the state Department of Agriculture, which oversees dog officers, said the agency is investigating the incident.

“It’s an open investigation, but we definitely will be filing citations,” she said.

Animal Friends is holding a fundraiser on its Facebook page. As of Thursday afternoon, more than $13,305 has been raised to care for the dogs.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.