No jail time for Elizabeth Boro ex-police chief who stole heroin from evidence room |

No jail time for Elizabeth Boro ex-police chief who stole heroin from evidence room

Natasha Lindstrom
Former Elizabeth Borough police Chief Timothy Butler

Former Elizabeth Borough police Chief Timothy Butler will not serve any jail time after pleading guilty to emptying his department’s evidence room of thousands of packets of heroin to feed his personal drug addiction.

Butler, 43, of Finleyville will spend about four years on probation. He also must perform 325 hours of community service — 250 hours for theft by failing to deposit municipal funds, and 75 hours for obstructing the law or other government function, court records show.

Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Robert J. Colville issued the sentence on Wednesday.

In late August, Butler pleaded guilty to charges of theft, drug possession and obstruction. In exchange for the plea deal, prosecutors dropped additional counts of obstruction and theft related to Butler’s failure to deposit money he collected from the borough’s parking meters.

Charles LoPresti, attorney for Butler, could not be reached for comment late Wednesday.

Butler, who joined Elizabeth’s police department nearly two decades ago and became chief in 2014, resigned from the post last December after he was confronted about all the heroin and related packaging missing from the evidence room he controlled.

RELATED: Former Elizabeth Borough police chief charged with stealing drugs

Other officers, including Sgt. Garrett Kimmell, reported noticing Butler exhibiting “suspicious behavior” on Dec. 6 while interacting with a man found in possession of suspected heroin, a criminal complaint said. When questioned, the man told officers he was making controlled drug buys for Butler.

The next day, Kimmell confronted Butler about his behavior, the complaint said. Initially, Butler denied having any problems, then told his sergeant he was addicted to heroin.

“Butler explained he became addicted after taking prescribed Vicodin (opioid painkillers) for neck and back pain and blamed the doctors,” District Attorney’s Detective Lyle Graber wrote in the complaint.

Kimmell asked Butler if there was any missing evidence.

Butler told him that the room “was a mess” and that “any heroin evidence was all gone,” the complaint said.

In a trash can in Butler’s office, authorities found more than 2,700 loose stamp bags, the small packets used to distribute heroin. They found 535 more loose stamp bags around Butler’s desk and an evidence envelope labeled to contain “approx. 2,531 bags of heroin.”

All of the containers had been emptied of heroin, and more evidence was missing, according to the criminal complaint.

One evidence envelope supposed to contain 1,000 stamp bags of heroin actually held 900 empty bags. An empty envelope that should have held 146 packets of heroin had just 134 empty ones inside, and another envelope held 554 empty packets instead of the 627 filled ones it was supposed to contain.

At a meeting last Dec. 10 with the borough solicitor and other officials, Butler apologized and wept, saying “he could not believe this was happening to him,” the complaint said.

“Butler also blamed the doctor, relating ‘once they got me off the pills, I had no choice,’” Graber wrote in the complaint.

Butler faced additional scrutiny and charges related to the borough’s missing parking meter money.

Butler was in charge of collecting and depositing the money from the meters, and no such deposits were made in 2017. In prior years, the borough’s parking revenue totaled between $4,000 and $6,000.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.