North Hills DUI checkpoint on Route 19 nets 5 arrests | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

North Hills DUI checkpoint on Route 19 nets 5 arrests

Natasha Lindstrom
1742034_web1_PoliceLightsZ

Five people were arrested Saturday at a sobriety checkpoint along Route 19/Perry Highway in McCandless, officials said.

The North Hills DUI Task Force conducted the checkpoint with help from the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration’s Checkpoint Strike Force.

Of more than 1,100 cars that passed through the stationary checkpoint near the Wexford shopping area:

• Eight people were administered field sobriety tests

• Three arrested for driving under the influence and one arrested for driving under the influence of drugs

• One arrested for possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia

• 22 citations were issued related to vehicle code violations

The law enforcement event marked the 17th DUI checkpoint of the year in the North Hills.

A total of 226 checkpoints or roving patrols have yielded 949 arrests by the North Hills DUI Task Force, according to DUI project coordinators Chief Jon Lape and Officer Brian Dobson of the West Deer Township Police Department.

The task force includes police from Etna, Indiana, Northern Regional, O’Hara, Ross, Shaler, West Deer, West View, McCandless and Millvale.

Butler DUI checkpoint yields 4 arrests

Also over the weekend, Pennsylvania State Police conducted a sobriety checkpoint along Route 8 in Center Township, Butler County, from 11 p.m. Friday through 3 a.m. Saturday.

Troopers at the Butler County checkpoint had contact with 155 drivers, making four DUI arrests, issuing 12 traffic citations and giving 26 warnings, state police said Sunday night.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.