North Huntington woman sentenced to federal prison for bank, mail fraud |

North Huntington woman sentenced to federal prison for bank, mail fraud

Chuck Biedka

A North Huntingdon woman convicted of embezzling from the Steel Valley Authority has been sentenced in federal court in Pittsburgh to 18 months in prison, the U.S. Attorney in Pittsburgh said.

The sentence was imposed on Nicolette Gizzi, 46, who had been convicted of bank and mail fraud.

Prosecutors said Gizzi embezzled checks for almost seven years from the Steel Valley Authority where she was financial manager. She issued checks to herself and her credit card company and forged signatures.

Also, Gizzi, who has a prior federal fraud conviction in South Carolina, defrauded the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of South Carolina when it attempted to collect restitution for her previous victim.

Prior to imposing sentence, U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon added an obstruction of justice sentencing enhancement because of false statements Gizzi made to the U.S. probation officers during her pre-sentencing interview.

U.S. Attorney Scott Brady said Gizzi “devised a scheme to embezzle over $82,000 in Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act funds from her employer at the expense of job seekers who were eligible for those resources.”

Gizzi also was sentenced to five years of supervised release following her prison sentence.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Lee J. Karl prosecuted the case.


Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.