Officials: Online threat made to Pittsburgh-area hospital not credible, traced to teen |

Officials: Online threat made to Pittsburgh-area hospital not credible, traced to teen

Michael DiVittorio

A Beaver County teen is responsible for online threats made Tuesday to commit a hate crime in Pittsburgh, officials said.

Police spokesman Chris Togneri said at 7:30 a.m. today that officers traced the threat to a Beaver County home and determined it was not credible.

“Police interviewed a male juvenile and his family and determined that the teen had no intentions to carry out the threat,” Togneri said.

Investigators worked overnight with officers from several jurisdictions.

On Tuesday, UPMC officials said they were working with local and federal law enforcement in response to the threat to commit a hate crime at an undisclosed Pittsburgh-area hospital.

“We take the safety and security of the staff, patients and visitors within our facilities seriously,” UPMC officials said. “UPMC police and security are aware of the threat and we are working to ensure that our hospitals remain safe and open to take care of our communities.”

Police are continuing to investigate and thanked the public for offering tips.

They Tweeted on Tuesday the importance of speaking up at the site of anything suspicious.

Mayor Bill Peduto also Tweeted yesterday about the situation.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.