Owner of Pennsylvania Coach Lines responds to Elizabeth Forward lawsuit | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Owner of Pennsylvania Coach Lines responds to Elizabeth Forward lawsuit

Emily Balser
1558391_web1_school-bus2

The owner of a transportation company the Elizabeth Forward School District recently filed a lawsuit against for breach of contract said the district isn’t telling the whole story.

The district filed an injunction on Thursday against Pennsylvania Coach Lines after, the district claims, the bus company breached their contract and are jeopardizing the transportation for thousands of students when school starts this week.

David Sunstein, president and owner of Pennsylvania Coach Lines, also known as PA Coach, said in a statement on Friday the district’s accusations are “both untruthful and inaccurate.”

Sunstein said the district failed to negotiate a new contract in good faith and in a timely fashion.

“We cannot account for the failure of the superintendent to negotiate in good faith and see to it that a fully written and integrated contract was executed in a timely fashion by the school district,” Sunstein said in the statement. “Despite many months of effort on our part beginning as early as March 2017, the district has been unable to reach an agreement beyond the contract which expired on June 30, 2019, with all duties fulfilled at that time.”

According to meeting and voting documents on the district’s website, the school board approved a new contract extending the end date of the transportation agreement with Pennsylvania Coach Lines to June 30, 2023. The agreement was approved Nov. 19, 2008 with an end date of June 30, 2019.

The district claims PA Coach hasn’t provided a legitimate explanation for its decision and, if left unchallenged, would result in nearly 2,350 students without district-provided transportation at the start of the school year.

Sunstein said the district also owed the company more than $1 million for past services as of last December.

“No reasons were ever given for the delay in payment, however our services continued unwaveringly,” he said. “Having no contract on August 2, 2019, we could no longer wait for the superintendent to act, and in an effort to clarify our position with the school board regarding the failure to reach agreement, we explained our intention to allocate our buses elsewhere.”

A frequently asked questions section on the district’s website said the district has “honored all financial obligations to Pennsylvania Coach Lines.”

“Over the past two weeks, EFSD has tried unsuccessfully to resolve this matter amicably with PA Coach and avoid litigation,” said Todd Keruskin, superintendent, in Thursday’s statement.

Sunstein continued to say they don’t undertake a multi-year, multi-million-dollar agreement without a signed contract for the benefit, protection and safety of everyone involved.

“This is not only a quality assurance of our business practice, it’s the requirement of the Pennsylvania School Code and the Auditor General of the Commonwealth which insist on these same safeguards,” he said. “I could not be more disappointed in the District’s actions.”

The district also said in the “frequently asked questions” section on its website they would delay the start of school if there is no resolution to the transportation issue. They are reviewing other options with other bus companies.

An e-mail sent to district to Keruskin for further comment Sunday afternoon wasn’t immediately returned.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.