ShareThis Page
PA Senate committee to hold hearing in Pittsburgh on methane emissions | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

PA Senate committee to hold hearing in Pittsburgh on methane emissions

Stephen Huba
1057312_web1_gtr-ArcMittalMtg-102318
Tribune-Review File
Smokestacks from the ArcelorMittal Coke Plant rise above the town of Monessen.

The Pennsylvania Senate Democratic Policy Committee will hold a special hearing Tuesday in Pittsburgh on “Controlling Methane Emissions.”

The hearing, scheduled for 10 a.m. to noon at the Teamsters Temple, 4701 Butler Street, Lawrenceville, will explore how Gov. Tom Wolf’s targets on carbon pollution can be met. Wolf pledged in January that state government would cut greenhouse gas emissions by 26 percent by 2025 and by 80 percent by 2050 — both from 2005 levels.

The hearing will be led by state Sens. Lisa Boscola, D-Bethlehem, Jay Costa, D-Pittsburgh, and Wayne Fontana, D-Pittsburgh.

Among those testifying will be Andrew Williams, director of regulatory and legislative affairs for the Environmental Defense Fund; Rebecca Kiernan, senior resilience coordinator for the city of Pittsburgh; Arvind Ravikumar, assistant professor of energy engineering at Harrisburg University of Science and Technology; Jared Metcalf, U.S. operations manager for Target Emission Services, Canonsburg; and Rob Altenburg, director of PennFuture Energy Center.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.