Pair charged in 2018 East Liberty pizza delivery death plead guilty |

Pair charged in 2018 East Liberty pizza delivery death plead guilty

Tom Davidson
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review file
D’Ambrosse Garland, 18, is transported by Pittsburgh police on Friday, Oct. 19, 2018, after being arrested for the shooting death of Domino’s delivery driver AbdulGhaniyu "Patrick" Sanusi.

The two men facing murder charges in the 2018 shooting death of a Nigerian pizza delivery driver in Pittsburgh’s East Liberty neighborhood reached plea deals and were sentenced Wednesday.

D’Ambrosse Garland, 18, of Marshall-Shadeland and Timothy Walls, 17, of Terrace Village pleaded guilty to third-degree murder, robbery and conspiracy before Judge Alex Bicket, according to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office. Garland also pleaded guilty to two firearms charges.

In exchange for the pleas, Bicket sentenced Garland to 20 to 40 years in prison, plus 10 years’ probation, and Walls to 9 to 19 years in prison.

The men were charged in the Oct. 13, 2018, shooting death of Abdulganiyu Sanusi, who went by Patrick Adesanya.

Adesanya, 56, was a pizza delivery driver who was shot twice and robbed in the middle of the day on North St. Clair Street. A Nigerian immigrant, he had been in the United States for about two years, working several jobs to support a wife and seven children still living in Nigeria.

Police interviewed 13 witnesses and used surveillance camera footage in the area to tie Garland and Walls to the killing.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.