Pair plead guilty in Pittsburgh cocaine distribution | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pair plead guilty in Pittsburgh cocaine distribution

Renatta Signorini
1751267_web1_web-gavelZ

Two men accused of bringing large amounts of cocaine into the Pittsburgh area between 2017 and 2018 pleaded guilty on Tuesday, according to U.S. Attorney Scott Brady.

Danny Jackson, 33, of New Jersey pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Moussa Jabateh, 32, of Florida pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine, according to federal authorities.

Between October 2017 and July 2018, Jabateh obtained the drugs and Jackson transported it about twice a month by bus from Philadelphia to Pittsburgh, investigators said. Authorities seized $8 million, 42 kilograms of cocaine, 12 kilograms of fentanyl, 3 kilograms of heroin and oxycodone.

Sentencing for Jabateh and Jackson is set for March 24. Jabateh consented to his deportation to Liberia after serving his sentence. Both will remain detained until their sentencing hearings.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.