Pittsburgh mayor Peduto, state lawmakers call for vote on Pa. gun bills | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh mayor Peduto, state lawmakers call for vote on Pa. gun bills

Bob Bauder
Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto

Two Democratic state lawmakers say they are prepared to heed Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto’s call for a vote on more restrictive firearms regulations and added that leaders of the Republican-controlled Legislature won’t allow that to happen.

Republicans, however, have pointed to anti-violence laws they have passed and signaled a willingness to work on some aspects of gun legislation while protecting those who legally own firearms in the state.

Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa of Forest Hills and state Rep. Ed Gainey of Lincoln-Lemington, both Democrats, said Republican leaders are holding up “common sense” legislation, including expanded background checks for gun purchases and a so-called extreme risk protection bill allowing courts to remove guns from a person deemed a public risk.

“We don’t control the process,” Costa said. “It’s controlled by Republicans, and it appears that they’ve been tone deaf as it relates to wanting to do some of the things that need to be done.”

Republican House Speaker Mike Turzai of Marshall was unavailable for comment, according to his chief of staff.

Jennifer Kocher, spokeswoman for Republican Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, said the General Assembly last year passed the first anti-violence legislation in decades that deals directly with firearms and is prepared to build on that. The law she referenced requires that people convicted of domestic violence crimes or subject to final restraining orders surrender their guns within 24 hours. Kocher said Republicans are also prepared to consider extreme risk protection and school safety concerns.

“While many of the issues being raised should be addressed on a national level, we will continue to take a holistic approach to tackling the cause of these tragedies and continue to take action,” Kocher said in a statement. “At the same time, we understand that we cannot take action that will criminalize the millions of Pennsylvanians who responsibly and legally own firearms.”

Peduto on Thursday joined about 200 other mayors from across the country in calling for the U.S. Senate to return from its break and act on proposed firearms bills. The mayors in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer, urged the Senate to vote on two bills expanding background checks for gun purchases.

Peduto earlier this week stood with Shannon Watts, founder of the anti-violence group Moms Demand Action, and urged state and federal lawmakers to vote on proposed gun bills within 30 days.

“I joined over 200 mayors — Democrat and Republican — today, calling on Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell to reconvene the U.S. Senate during their month-long vacation in order to be able to come back and do their job,” he said.

Nearly two-thirds of registered voters in a recent statewide poll said they favor some type of additional laws regulating gun ownership.

Gainey, who has proposed a ban on all military-style, semi-automatic rifles, said it’s time for bipartisan agreement that gun laws need to change.

“We need to let people know that nobody wants to take your guns, but there’s no reason why guns of mass destruction need to be on our streets,” he said. “If you continue to remain blind to something that’s going on, then it’s a statement that you’re OK with the amount of killing that’s going on.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-564-3080, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.