Penn Hills man found guilty in drug bust could face 15 years to life in prison |

Penn Hills man found guilty in drug bust could face 15 years to life in prison

Natasha Lindstrom
Crack cocaine

A Penn Hills man caught by police three years ago with nearly 20 pounds of marijuana, 150 grams of powdered cocaine and 340 grams of crack cocaine has been convicted on drugs and firearms charges, federal prosecutors said Thursday.

After deliberating for about two hours, a federal jury of nine men and three women found Denver Sangster, 43, guilty on several counts, including possession with the intent to deliver more than 280 grams of crack cocaine and possession of firearms used for drug trafficking, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said.

The charges carry a minimum sentence of 15 years and up to life in prison, Brady said.

On March 30, 2016, Pittsburgh police executed a search warrant at Sangster’s car and former home, on Orin Street in Pittsburgh’s Arlington neighborhood.

During the search, they seized large amounts of marijuana, cocaine and crack cocaine as well as four loaded guns, prosecutors said.

Assistant U.S. attorneys Brendan T. Conway and Brian Czarnecki prosecuted the case with help from Pittsburgh police and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

U.S. District Judge David Stewart Cercone scheduled Sangster’s sentencing for Oct. 1.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.