Penn Hills School District officials request investigation into grand jury report |

Penn Hills School District officials request investigation into grand jury report

Michael DiVittorio
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro
Penn Hills School District’s administration office

Penn Hills School District officials want state Attorney General Josh Shapiro to investigate after an Allegheny County grand jury report netted no indictments.

“We are not accepting them,” board President Erin Vecchio said of the grand jury report’s results. “People should have been indicted. All it was was a smear tactic. The taxpayers of Penn Hills deserve more than that.”

The district sent a letter to Shapiro’s office Tuesday requesting it “make an independent determination on any criminality that may have taken place.”

It’s unclear when Shapiro would respond.

The grand jury report, which came after more than two years of investigating, was released Feb. 5.

It says district leaders were guilty of “inexcusable carelessness that brought it to “economic ruin” but failed to find cause to recommend criminal charges.

“This report amounts to a whitewash of any wrongdoing by those individuals involved,” the district’s letter reads.

The grand jury, convened by Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr., also cited concerns over possible ethics violations and conflicts of interest. But it did not address possible criminal actions outlined in an earlier report by state Auditor General Eugene DePasquale released in May 2016.

The audit highlighted several items not mentioned in the grand jury report such as school-issued credit card abuse and unchecked theft of district fuel among other issues.

“I would like to get a reasonable explanation on the grand jury results,” board Vice President George Sens said. “I don’t believe it addressed the issues, itself. I don’t believe it addressed any criminal charges. I believe there were some crimes committed.”

The district’s debt is about $172 million and climbing mostly to pay off debt for high school and elementary construction.

Vecchio said she hopes Shapiro would review all the grand jury testimony because she says the report does not dig deep enough into what happened in the district and with those schools.

“They have my name in their (report) more than anybody else — and I wasn’t even on the board (when the schools were built),” she said. “I wasn’t there during any part of the construction. The schools we voted on and planned (while I was on the board) would have worked.

“They changed the plan and made it bigger — even with declining population. If they stuck with the plan, we wouldn’t be in this mess.”

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.