PennDOT to clean drains along flood-prone area of Route 28 | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

PennDOT to clean drains along flood-prone area of Route 28

1420372_web1_ptr-28Flooding-053019
Courtesy of Dave McDonough
Flooding closed the southbound lanes of Route 28 for hours on Wednesday, May 29, 2019.

PennDOT plans to clean drainage pipes along an area of busy Route 28 in Pittsburgh that flooded last week for the second time in two months.

The work, scheduled to take place from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Wednesday through Friday, will occur between the 40th and 31st bridges. Motorists will encounter lane restrictions during the work.

Route 28 was closed in the area for most of the day Thursday after a storm dumped more than 2 inches of rain on the region. Traffic backed up for miles, leaving motorists stranded for several hours.

Drivers caught in a similar flood May 29 had to be rescued by first responders after their vehicles became trapped in the water.

Cheryl Moon-Sirianni, executive for PennDOT’s District 11, told the Tribune-Review on Monday that flooding is happening during heavy rain at the site of the former Millvale Industrial Park that was demolished as part of a $180 million reconstruction of Route 28. The project wrapped up in 2014.

Officials have attributed flooding to silt and debris running off a hillside and clogging drainage ditches on the hillside and a drain for a stormwater retention pond along the highway. Troy Hill sits atop the hill.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.