Pitcairn man charged with ethnic intimidation of neighbor | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pitcairn man charged with ethnic intimidation of neighbor

Dillon Carr
1405279_web1_GavelNewN

A Pitcairn man faces charges for allegedly causing damage to his neighbor’s property and ethnic intimidation.

James Cepec, 78, started harassing and intimidating his neighbor, a black woman, after a supposed dispute between them over property lines, according to a criminal complaint.

Pitcairn police Chief Scott Farally said the dispute began when Cepec placed tree logs on his neighbor’s property in May. His neighbor paid to remove them back onto Cepec’s property, but he moved them over again — this time using a bulldozer, Farally said.

“(She) believes the damage done to her property would cost about $2,000 to $2,500, but she has not had an official estimate done yet,” Farally said.

Cepec faced civil charges in May, but it escalated when he used racial slurs during the argument over property lines.

He faced Plum Magistrate Linda Zucco on July 10, where his case was moved to Monroeville Magistrate Jeffrey Herbst for a preliminary hearing in September. He faces charges of simple assault, intimidation of witnesses, harassment, defiant trespassing, criminal mischief and ethnic intimidation.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.