Pitt researchers receive $175K grant for Pittsburgh water study | TribLIVE.com

Pitt researchers receive $175K grant for Pittsburgh water study

Bob Bauder
Tribune-Review file
Water The University of Pittsburgh will conduct a study of Pittsburgh water to determine the environmental impact of a lead inhibiting chemical. The University of Pittsburgh will conduct a study of Pittsburgh water to determine the environmental impact of a lead inhibiting chemical.

University of Pittsburgh researchers will study the environmental impact of the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority’s use of a chemical to reduce lead levels in city drinking water.

The National Science Foundation awarded professors Sarah Haig and Emily Elliott a $175,000 grant to study the environmental effect of orthophosphate, which coats the inside of pipes and prevents lead from leaching into water.

The study is expected to take one year.

Phosphates, also used in fertilizers, can cause excessive plant growth in lakes, rivers and streams and deprive aquatic life of life-essential oxygen, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Haig said in a statement that the project will look at how leaks in the city’s infrastructure could impact area ecosystems.

“Not only will this project reveal the treatment’s immediate effects on Pittsburgh’s ecosystems, but it will also provide insights that will benefit other cities implementing this treatment,” Haig said in a statement.

PWSA spokesman Will Pickering said the authority is partnering with Pitt on the study.

PWSA earlier this week began adding the EPA-approved orthophosphate to drinking water as part of its efforts to address high lead levels in its system. Pittsburgh water since 2016 has exceeded a federal lead threshold of 15 parts per billion. The most recent testing indicated levels of 20 ppb.

The authority also plans to replace all lead water pipes in its system, which includes about 300,000 residents of the city and surrounding communities.

Haig is an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering and Elliott is an associate professor of geology and environmental science.

They will evaluate samples provided by PWSA to assess and monitor changes in ecology, water chemistry and nutrient availability in water collected from pipes and streams connected to the system.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.