Pittsburgh airport trains running after breakdown | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh airport trains running after breakdown

Brian C. Rittmeyer
1462488_web1_PTR-FLIGHTS-05-012316
File photo
Pittsburgh International Airport.

The trains that ferry passengers between the landside and airside terminals at Pittsburgh International Airport are functioning normally Friday morning following a breakdown overnight, an airport spokesman said.

Airport spokesman Bob Kerlik said there was a “brief period” earlier Friday when both trains were down.

The south train was out of service for regularly scheduled maintenance overnight, he said.

The north train “unexpectedly went down” for about an hour, between 11:30 p.m. Thursday and 12:30 a.m. Friday.

Kerlik said the airport bused passengers between the terminals for that hour. Passengers were also able to talk between terminals through a pedestrian tunnel. Airport staff were on hand to direct passengers, Kerlik said.

Passengers took to social media to document walking through the tunnel to airside terminal.

That user later tweeted “I need the exercise. And it wasn’t bad.”

Others took the airport to task for the breakdown.

Pittsburgh International Airport in 2017 became the first U.S. airport to be named Airport of the Year by Air Transport World magazine.

A $1.1 billion overhaul of the airport will see a new landside terminal built that is connected to the airside terminal, eliminating the need for the trains.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.