Pittsburgh attorney confirmed as federal judge | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh attorney confirmed as federal judge

Megan Guza
J. Nicholas Ranjan, a managing partner with K&L Gates’ Pittsburgh office, was confirmed by the U.S. Senate as a U.S. District Judge for Pennsylvania’s Western District on Wednesday, July 10, 2019.

The U.S. Senate on Wednesday confirmed a K&L Gates attorney from Pittsburgh as a U.S. District Court judge in Pennsylvania’s Western District.

J. Nicholas Ranjan, a managing partner with the firm, was nominated by President Trump in July 2018, according to a release from the firm. His term will begin in August.

As a commercial litigation attorney, Ranjan has focused on the energy industry, arbitration and defense against class action lawsuits, according to the release. He served as the chairman of the Pittsburgh office’s diversity committee.

James Segerdahl, a global managing partner with K&L Gates, said Ranjan will be “an outstanding federal judge.

“He has the intellect, temperament and judgment required to excel in the critically important role of federal jurist,” he said in a statement.

The Senate confirmed Ranjan in an 80-14 vote. Pennsylvania U.S. Sens. Pat Toomey and Bob Casey both voted to confirm Ranjan, a graduate of Grove City College and the University of Michigan Law School.

Casey said Ranjan’s work as a federal law clerk and in private practice make him well-suited for the position. Toomey called him “an excellent addition” to the bench.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.