Pittsburgh authority gives preliminary OK for development of former Civic Arena site | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh authority gives preliminary OK for development of former Civic Arena site

Bob Bauder
1827469_web1_Civic-arena-rendering
An architect’s rendering of the Penguin’s planned development of the former Civic Arena property in Pittsburgh’s Lower Hill District.

The Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority gave preliminary approval Friday for the Penguins to begin a first phase of construction estimated at $210 million at the former Civic Arena property in the city’s Hill District.

The approval marks the first step in what all sides say will be a long process to convert the Lower Hill District into a mixed residential and retail complex.

The Pittsburgh Penguins own development rights to the 28-acre site.

“It’s the first time that the Penguins development team has actually advanced development on the site,” said Kevin Acklin, the hockey team’s general counsel. “This is going to be hard. This is going to be a multi-year process. This is the first time that you’ve ever seen this level of development in the Lower Hill District.”

The Penguins are proposing to build a parking garage with 288 spaces and a live entertainment venue along Logan Street between Bedford and Wylie avenues.

Construction of the building hinges on Pittsburgh City Council approval to defer 75 % of parking taxes — totaling an estimated $24.3 million over 19 years — to help pay for construction.

The building would include space for relocation of a Pittsburgh EMS rescue unit now on the Boulevard of the Allies at no cost to the city and a small business incubator for locally-owned minority businesses. The Penguins would lease the incubator space to the redevelopment authority for $1 annually, with a purchase option after 29 years.

Plans include two residential buildings at the southeast corner of Wylie Avenue and Fullerton Street — one six stories and the other 12 stories — with 288 apartments and an 221-space underground parking garage.

The buildings would house 61 two-bedroom, 132 one-bedroom, 77 studio and 19 “micro apartments.” It would include amenities such as fitness centers, community rooms, sundecks and rooftop patios, according to the redevelopment authority.

Fifty-eight of the apartments would be affordable for low-income residents.

The development also calls for a restructured tax abatement plan subject to approval by the city, Pittsburgh Public School District and Allegheny County. The tax abatement is expected to generate $80 million in tax revenue over 10 years based on increased value of the property.

Under the agreement, $40 million would go toward a fund for improvements in the Hill District and $40 million for infrastructure improvements around the development.

The Penguins have agreed to borrow $40 million if final approval is granted and immediately make a lump sum into the fund, according to Acklin.

The preliminary development plans must be approved by the Pittsburgh-Allegheny County Sports and Exhibition Authority, which owns most of the property. SEA directors are expected to review the development in November.

Hill District residents have criticized the process, saying the redevelopment authority has not given them time to review plans in detail and once again requested a delay in the vote. They submitted a letter outlining amenities they would like to see included in the Penguins’ plans.

URA members agreed to form a committee to review the letter and issue a report within 30 days.

“I’m glad we’re here,” said Pittsburgh City Councilman R. Daniel Lavelle, a Hill District resident and URA board member. “This is a first time we’ve actually taken a real step to move this Lower Hill development forward.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.