Pittsburgh controller predicts large surplus for 2019 | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh controller predicts large surplus for 2019

Bob Bauder
1361216_web1_Michael-Lamb
Bob Bauder | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Controller Michael Lamb said the city could realize a $10 million surplus in 2019

Pittsburgh is spending within its 2019 budget projection and is headed for a larger than anticipated surplus at year’s end, the city controller said Monday.

Controller Michael Lamb, who released his Popular Annual Financial Report for 2018, said 2019 revenues from all tax sources are exceeding projections and departments, with the exception of the Emergency Medical Services and the police bureau, are hitting budget projections. The city’s total general fund budget is $568 million.

“The real possibility is we will finish the year within budget and with the increase in revenues, the city anticipated a surplus this year of around $7 million,” he said. “We’re going to do better than that. We’ll probably be north of $10 million before the year’s over as far as the surplus.”

The EMS Bureau had spent 54 percent of its $22.6 million budget by June 30 and the police bureau had spent about 53 percent of its $104 million budget, but Lamb said it wasn’t an unusual situation for those two departments.

“That’s something that happens,” he said. “It’s not so much over that they can’t correct and make that back through the rest of the year.”

The Popular Annual Financial Report is a shortened version of Lamb’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The report is available online and Lamb said copies of the PAFR are available in his office.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.