Pittsburgh councilmen want racism to be treated as public health crisis | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh councilmen want racism to be treated as public health crisis

Tom Davidson
1840859_web1_burgess-and-lavelle
Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh City Councilmen Ricky Burgess, right, and R. Daniel Lavelle are shown in this 2018 file photo. Standing to the left of them is Taili Thompson, Allegheny County’s violence prevention coordinator.

Two Pittsburgh councilmen introduced legislation Tuesday aimed at combating racism in the city.

The trio of bills would declare racism a public health crisis in the city and establish a leadership forum and investment fund to eliminate racial inequalities and barriers.

“I think the time for talk is past. It’s time for specific actions to address this problem,” said Councilman Ricky Burgess of North Point Breeze. “We have to specifically attack this problem.”

Burgess and Councilman R. Daniel Lavelle of the Hill District introduced the legislation.

“The mayor looks forward to working with Councilmen Lavelle and Rev. Burgess on the legislation,” Tim McNulty, spokesman for Mayor Bill Peduto, said in a statement.

The All-In Cities Leadership Forum would meet quarterly with an annual conference. It would help implement actions to address racism in the city and encourage minority economic development and home ownership, according to Burgess.

The investment fund would be managed by the Poise Foundation, a Downtown-based community foundation that aims to improve the lives of African-Americans in Pittsburgh, and it would be used to develop mixed-income housing and encourage black-owned businesses in the city.

Burgess and Lavelle urged “large nonprofits, banks and education institutions that have profited and continue to profit from the Pittsburgh’s inequalities” to contribute to the fund, according to a release the councilmen put out announcing the legislation. Burgess declined to say what institutions he thought should contribute.

The proposal comes on the heels of a September report, “Pittsburgh’s Inequality Across Gender and Race,” conducted by researchers from the University of Pittsburgh for the city’s Gender Equity Commission. It found stark inequities based on race in the city.

It also comes five months after Lavelle and Burgess spearheaded the city’s All-In initiatives to increase diversity in city government.

Treating racism as a public health crisis would mimic a similar effort in Milwaukee earlier this year, Burgess said.

He called racism a “severe and systemic problem” in Pittsburgh that requires a coordinated response to address it.

The resolutions will need to pass a first vote next week and could be adopted at the Nov. 4 council meeting, according to Burgess.

Lavelle didn’t respond to requests for further comment.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.