Pittsburgh ended 2018 in ‘strong financial position,’ controller says | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh ended 2018 in ‘strong financial position,’ controller says

Bob Bauder
Bob Bauder | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Controller Michael Lamb on Wednesday, May 1, 2019, released his Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for 2018 and gave the city glowing marks for financial stability. Pittsburgh Controller Michael Lamb released his Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for 2018 and gave the city strong marks for financial stability.

Pittsburgh ended 2018 with a $3.3 million general fund surplus despite moving nearly $50 million out of the operating budget for capital projects, affordable housing and employee pensions, Controller Michael Lamb said Wednesday.

Lamb in releasing his Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for 2018 noted that Pittsburgh had a total unassigned fund balance of $114 million — equal to 20 percent of the $568 million operating budget for 2019 — at year’s end. He also noted that Pittsburgh in 2018 was freed from state financial oversight for a first time since 2006 when it was facing bankruptcy.

Pittsburgh in 2018 transferred $26 million to its capital budget, provided the Urban Redevelopment Authority with a $10 million grant for its Housing Opportunity Fund for affordable housing and pumped an additional $13 million in parking tax revenue into employee pension funds, he said.

“In doing all of that we generated a surplus,”Lamb said. “It’s a very strong financial position for the city.”

The only downside was a loss in the invested portion of employee pension funds because of a stock market decline. The funds lost about $20 million, but have since made up the loss with increased returns. At year’s end funds for retired police officers, firefighters and municipal employees totaled around $450 million and have since increased to about $463 million, Lamb said.

Pension funds experienced a marked improvement since 2010 when the city was facing state takeover of the underfunded plans. For a first time in 2018, Lamb said, the city contributed more money to pension funds than it paid out.

“If we can continue to do that and just allow this portfolio to grow, even if we only earn 5 percent over the next 20 years, we’re going to have $1 billion in 17 years,” he said. “That’s the power of compound interest.”

Tax revenues last year increased across the board, including a $1.6 million growth in parking taxes, $3.2 million in earned income taxes, $4.6 million in real estate taxes, $1.5 million in local services taxes, $3.5 million in payroll preparation taxes and $50,994 in amusement taxes.

Lamb said the local service tax — $52 levied on every person working within city limits — was significant because it indicates job growth. The tax has been stagnant for years.

“I think that portends good things for us moving forward,” Lamb said.

Spending on operations and capital projects also increased by about $39 million. Lamb criticized a $40 million bond issue that was used to purchase a building along the Boulevard of the Allies to house city offices, including Permits Licenses and Inspections. The building will also house the Urban Redevelopment Authority and the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh.

The three agencies are splitting the cost.

“I call it the Permit Palace,” Lamb said. “I’m still bothered by that purchase, that we spent that much money to house our employees.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.