Pittsburgh, guns rights group spar over signs posted ahead of Monday rally | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh, guns rights group spar over signs posted ahead of Monday rally

Bob Bauder
A sign inside the City-County Buildings Grant Street entrance advises visitors that firearms are prohibited inside the building and that lockers are available for visitors to check legal weapons.
Bob Bauder Tribune-Review
A sign outside the City-County Building’s Ross Street entrance is parcially obscured by other notices.

Call it a first shot in what is expected to be a lengthy and emotional battle over proposed gun regulations in Pittsburgh.

The city and gun rights groups butted heads Friday over signs put up this week warning City-County Building visitors that firearms are prohibited in the building in advance of a large gun rights rally planned for Monday.

Joshua Prince, an attorney representing The Allegheny County Sportsmen’s League and Firearm Owners Against Crime, contended the sandwich board warning signs were illegal under Pennsylvania law because they did not inform visitors that lockers are available for checking legal firearms.

The city responded Friday by adding more signs with information about the lockers, but one of the signs posted on a bulletin board outside the Ross Street entrance is partially obscured and visitors have to enter the building on Grant Street to see the notices.

Prince threatened to sue and described the city’s actions as “official oppression.” He said would ask Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr.’s office to investigate.

“It seems interesting that now they’re trying to hide the signage,” Prince said.

Dan Gilman, Mayor Bill Peduto’s chief of staff, denied any subterfuge on the part of the city.

“Certainly not,” he said. “The city has every intention of complying with all of the applicable laws.”

Hundreds of activists openly carrying firearms are expected to protest a proposed ban on semiautomatic rifles and certain ammunition and firearms accessories within city limits. The rally is scheduled for noon Monday outside the City-County Building. The city posted Wednesday two sandwich board warning signs at building entrances in anticipation of the event.

Pittsburgh City Council introduced the ordinances last month in wake of a mass shooting on Oct. 27 at Squirrel Hill’s Tree of Life synagogue, in which 11 worshipers were killed by a man armed with an assault rifle.

The proposed ban drew an outcry from gun rights activists who argue that Pennsylvania law prohibits municipalities from regulating firearms. They said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has upheld the preemption in multiple cases, including a 10-year-old city ordinance that would require the reporting of lost or stolen handguns.

Pittsburgh police have never enforced the ordinance because of the preemption.

City Council has scheduled a public hearing on the ban for 6 p.m. on Jan. 24. The hearing will be held in council chambers on the fifth floor of the City-County Building. Council is expected to vote on the bills in February.

Officials said numerous police offices would be posted in and outside the City-County Building during the protest and Peduto said the city would consider closing Grant Street.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter @bobbauder.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.