Pittsburgh lead levels in water drop as PWSA claims orthophosphate working | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh lead levels in water drop as PWSA claims orthophosphate working

Tom Davidson
1463410_web1_web-waterglass

Lead levels in Pittsburgh’s water system are decreasing but remain above federal thresholds, according to the latest test results released Friday by the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority.

PWSA said the drop indicates an additive the authority started using in April that coats lead pipes to prevent them from contaminating the water is working.

The latest round of testing covers January to June. During that time, 176 samples from problem areas were tested. Of those, 88% were beneath the 15 parts per billion action level set by the Environmental Protection Agency. Twenty of the samples were above that level and six tested above 50 parts per billion, the PWSA said.

It’s a slight drop from the last testing period, July through December 2018, when 161 samples were tested and 24 were above 15 parts per billion.

The EPA requires action from test results than exceed 15 parts per billion in what it terms the 90th percentile results. The latest tests were 17.52 ppb, PWSA said.

It’s an increase of where the levels were in July 2018, when the PWSA 90th percentile results were 10 ppb. In January 2018, tests showed PWSA’s levels were 21 ppb.

In order to be considered in compliance with federal lead regulations, the authority would have to test at or below 15 parts per billion twice in a row.

In April, PWSA started adding orthophosphate, a chemical that coats the inside of pipes to prevent lead from leaching into water and has been a major component in the authority’s plans to address lead contamination. It will take about six months for the orthophosphate to reach its full effect, PWSA said.

“We now have every reason to believe our treatment upgrades are working as planned,” PWSA board chairman Paul Leger said in a statement.

PWSA also is replacing lead lines. Since 2016, PWSA has replaced more than 4,200 lead service lines as part of a consent agreement with the state Department of Environmental Protection.

About 15% of homes have lead service lines and PWSA also has plans to replace 4,400 public service lines that have lead in them through a $49 million state funding package. When it replaces a public line, PWSA offers no-cost private lead line replacements that are served by that line.

For more information about PWSA’s programs to eliminate lead from its water system, click here.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.