Pittsburgh man accused in 2 overdose deaths gets 23 years in federal prison | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh man accused in 2 overdose deaths gets 23 years in federal prison

Renatta Signorini
1432266_web1_web-courts11

A Pittsburgh man who authorities said distributed drugs connected to two fatal overdoses was sentenced Thursday to 23 years in a federal prison, according to U.S. Attorney Scott Brady.

Justin McBride, 27, will spend six years on supervised release after the prison term on charges of distribution of heroin and fentanyl resulting in serious bodily injury and death, Brady said in an announcement.

The drugs authorities said McBride distributed were connected to the deaths of victims only identified as E.B and T.B. in court records. Another person, identified as J.B., overdosed but survived, authorities said.

E.B. died of acute fentanyl toxicity after purchasing drugs from McBride on Oct. 4, 2016, according to the announcement. T.B. died from combined drug toxicity of heroin and fentanyl after purchasing drugs from McBride on Jan. 30, 2017. J.B. overdosed on fentanyl he purchased from McBride on July 8, 2017, but was revived by paramedics.

Police used T.B.’s phone to set up an undercover purchase with McBride.

He was among five people who were indicted in April 2018 in connection with a family-run heroin and fentanyl organization operating out of locations in Pittsburgh and Munhall between 2014 and 2017.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.