Pittsburgh man accused of dealing heroin-fentanyl mix that caused overdose death | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh man accused of dealing heroin-fentanyl mix that caused overdose death

Natasha Lindstrom

A federal grand jury indicted a Pittsburgh man on charges of delivering the heroin and fentanyl mix that resulted in a drug user dying of an overdose last year, prosecutors said Monday.

Davonte Dugger, 20, faces narcotics charges stemming from a Drug Enforcement Administration investigation into the overdose death and related drug-dealing during the fall of 2018, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said.

The grand jury’s three-count indictment accuses Dugger of selling heroin and fentanyl on Aug. 7, 2018, that caused serious bodily injury and the death of a person.

A judge unsealed the July 23 indictment last week.

Officials did not name the person who died in a news release. Court records do not yet provide further details.

Dugger is the only defendant in the case regarding the fatal overdose, according to Brady.

Dugger also is accused of possessing with the intent to distribute quantities of heroin, fentanyl and acetyl fentanyl on at least two other occasions in October.

The DEA conducted the investigation with help from Moon Township police.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark V. Gurzo is prosecuting the case.

If convicted, Dugger faces up a possible sentence of not less than 20 years and up to life in prison and a fine up to $7 million.

He is set to be arraigned Friday morning before Judge Patricia L. Dodge.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.