Pittsburgh man convicted of federal firearms violation sentenced to 4 years in prison | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh man convicted of federal firearms violation sentenced to 4 years in prison

Michael DiVittorio

A Pittsburgh man was sentenced in federal court to four years in prison and three years of supervised release for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.

U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon imposed the sentence on LaRon Hollaman, 29, federal authorities announced Tuesday.

Bissoon also ordered the sentence to be served consecutive to any state parole violation.

Authorities said Robinson police observed Hollaman engage in suspicious drug activity in the parking lot of the Hilltop Inn on May 6, 2017.

The officer then followed Hollaman to a nearby GetGo gas station to investigate further.

Authorities said Hollaman told the officer, “I just did six up at State,” referring to his prior conviction, when asked for his license and registration. He also told police about two guns loaded underneath the front passenger seat.

Police arrested Hollaman and recovered the guns, which were reported stolen out of Pittsburgh.

Authorities said Hollaman, at the time of his arrest, was on state parole for a carjacking and two separate illegal firearms possession charges.

The Drug Enforcement Agency, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, and the Robinson Police Department conducted the investigation that led to the guilty plea and sentence in this case.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.