ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh man pleading guilty to cocaine sales in federal case | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh man pleading guilty to cocaine sales in federal case

Chuck Biedka
| Wednesday, February 20, 2019 1:30 a.m
778881_web1_web_jail

A Pittsburgh man pleaded guilty in federal court in Wednesday to conspiracy to distribute cocaine.

Lawrence Morrison, 36, entered the plea before Senior U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab in Pittsburgh.

According to prosecutors, the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration started a wiretap investigation, primarily targeting the GBK street gang and drug trafficking in and around an area known as the Greenway Projects, located in Pittsburgh’s West End.

The wiretap investigation, dubbed Operation Gang Green, revealed that from about November 2017 to last June, Lawrence Morrison and his co-conspirators distributed unspecified quantities of cocaine.

Judge Schwab scheduled Morrison’s sentencing for June 19.

Morrison remains in jail.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Tonya Sulia Goodman and Rachael Dizard are prosecuting this case.

The FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration jointly led the investigation, which also included Pittsburgh Police, Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office, state police, Robinson and Stowe township police departments, state Attorney General’s Office, Wilkinsburg and McKees Rocks police.

The investigation was funded by the federal Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force Program.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, cbiedka@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.