Pittsburgh man pleads guilty to drug possession in raid that sickened 18 officers | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh man pleads guilty to drug possession in raid that sickened 18 officers

Renatta Signorini
1653606_web1_web-gavelZ

A Pittsburgh man pleaded guilty Monday to conspiracy and drug possession in connection with a large amount of a fentanyl analogue that was found at his West End home two years ago, according to federal authorities.

Anthony Lozito, 40, was arrested Aug. 7, 2017 during a raid that sent 18 Pittsburgh SWAT officers to a hospital after a table holding cyclopropyl fentanyl overturned, causing the powder to become airborne.

Sentencing is set for Jan. 21.

Lozito and three others were arrested when Pittsburgh police and state troopers helped federal investigators with serving search warrants. During one of the raids at Lozito’s Bond Street home, the table overturned, and the officers were hospitalized after experiencing dizziness and numbness. No one was hurt.

Federal authorities said they found large amounts of drugs and packaging paraphernalia at Lozito’s house. Investigators seized a total of 235 grams of cyclopropyl fentanyl during the raids, according to federal authorities.

Lozito will remain detained until sentencing.

Fentanyl is a powerful opioid painkiller. It can be illicitly produced overseas and then shipped into the United States where it has contributed to an explosion of drug overdose deaths in recent years. With a tweak of the molecular structure, a new form of fentanyl can be illicitly created in laboratories.

Fentanyl contributed to 875 drug overdose deaths in Allegheny County in 2017 and 2018, according to medical examiner statistics.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.