Pittsburgh man shot during July robbery dies | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh man shot during July robbery dies

Tom Davidson
Onaje Dickinson pictured July 2018.

A man shot during a July 2 robbery in Pittsburgh’s Spring Hill-City View neighborhood died Monday, according to the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s office.

Julian Carpenter, 24, of Pittsburgh died at 10:27 p.m. at a city hospital.

He was shot by Onaje Dickinson, who was killed two weeks later in Penn Hills by a police officer investigating a similar robbery, according to court paperwork filed in connection to the robbery.

Carpenter was shot at an apartment in the 2100 block of Rhine Street. He thought he was meeting Shayla Johnson, a friend, but was instead robbed and shot, according to police. Johnson, 17, of Brighton Heights, is charged with conspiracy and criminal use of a phone, for luring Carpenter to the area, according to a criminal complaint filed against Johnson.

The gun used to shoot Carpenter matched the gun found in Penn Hills in the July 14 officer-involved shooting death of Onaje Dickinson.

Dickinson, 20, of Pittsburgh was shot and killed by Penn Hills police Officer Jared Rothert, who returned fire after Dickinson fired three shots while hiding in a basement. Police were searching for Dickinson because they suspected him in another robbery. Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. found Rothert acted properly when he used his weapon.

Dickinson used similar tactics in several robberies since May, Zappala said.

The charges against Johnson are currently in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court, but a hearing to move the case to juvenile court is set for Dec. 6, according to Zappala spokesman Mike Manko.

Police are still investigating Carpenter’s death, public safety spokesman Chris Togneri said.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.