Pittsburgh man tossed from World Series of Poker for nudity, shoe-throwing facing terrorism charge | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh man tossed from World Series of Poker for nudity, shoe-throwing facing terrorism charge

Steven Adams
1634677_web1_web-poker
File

Some antics at the poker table were just the start of the growing troubles for one Pittsburgh man.

Ken Strauss, 45, had a seat at the table of the World Series of Poker Main Event in Las Vegas earlier this summer, reports Deadspin. His behavior was questionable from the start when he went all-in blind on the first hand.

That was followed by Strauss pulling down his pants, showing his bare butt to his fellow players, and throwing his shoe at the dealer, according to Deadspin’s report.

He was ejected from the tournament and gave up his $10,000 buy-in during the first level of play on July 5.

But Strauss was apparently butting heads with some casinos weeks later when he tweeted to the Venetian Resort with the phrase “all casinos that have me banned will be destroyed effective immediately.”

Strauss has been indicted by Clark County authorities on a felony charge of terroristic threats, report PocketFives.

Arrest records show that Strauss is being detained and has a hearing next week.

The arrest report details more incidents involving Strauss. Read them at PocketFives.

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.