Pittsburgh might not be as hard-working as you think | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh might not be as hard-working as you think

Chris Pastrick

Lazy bunch of …

Pittsburghers, according to a study from WalletHub, are the 103rd hardest-working group in the United States. Say it a different way: Pittsburghers don’t really work that hard.

Hang on a second. Pittsburgh? Not hard-working? That has to be wrong, right?

Pittsburgh is as blue-collar as it gets. What about our gruff, steelworker image? What about our driven, growing tech-hub image? What about our winning sports teams?

With Employee Appreciation Day coming up March 1, WalletHub took the 116 largest cities and looked at 10 key metrics — like average hours worked per week, employment rate, workers with multiple jobs, commute times, and unused vacation days. What they found was that Pittsburgh ranked 103 out of 116 cities. Yeah, that’s pretty near the bottom of the list.

Anchorage, Alaska, was the hardest working city — with a cumulative score of 79.03. Pittsburgh scored 47.37.

The top five rounded out with San Francisco; Irving, Texas; Virginia Beach, Va.; and Plano, Texas.

Source: WalletHub

Yep, Virginia Beach!

Who else scored better than Pittsburgh? Honolulu (16th), Nashville (20th), Boston (46th), Baltimore (60th), Las Vegas (87th), Philadelphia (92nd).

Even Cincinnati — at 101 — was two slots better than Pittsburgh.

One small note of victory for the Black and Gold city: Cleveland came in 113th, three slots from dead last.

WalletHub’s study found that the average U.S. worker puts in 1,780 hours per year – 70 hours more than the average worker in Japan, 266 more than the United Kingdom, and 424 more than Germany.

If these numbers hold true, we’ve gotta pick up our game, Pittsburgh.

Get movin’!

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Chris at 412-320-7898, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.