Pittsburgh mother sentenced to 5-10 years in daughter’s OD death | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh mother sentenced to 5-10 years in daughter’s OD death

Renatta Signorini
1725768_web1_Jhenea-Pratt

A Pittsburgh woman was sentenced Wednesday to five to 10 years in a state prison for her toddler’s 2018 death from a fentanyl overdose.

Jhenea Pratt, 24, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and child endangerment during a June trial.

Pratt has been jailed since her August 2018 arrest. Prosecutors said her 17-month-old daughter, Charlette Napper-Talley, was pronounced dead April 5, 2018, about an hour after Pratt called paramedics to her East Hills apartment.

An autopsy showed the girl ingested fentanyl. Two sippy cups were seized from Pratt’s apartment, one of which tested positive for fentanyl, police said.

Fentanyl is a powerful opioid painkiller. It can be illicitly produced overseas and then shipped into the United States, where it has contributed to an explosion of drug overdose deaths locally and nationally in recent years. With a tweak of the molecular structure, a new form of fentanyl can be illicitly created in laboratories.

Fentanyl contributed to 875 drug overdose deaths in Allegheny County in 2017 and 2018, according to medical examiner statistics.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.