Pittsburgh ordinance would regulate reptile ownership | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh ordinance would regulate reptile ownership

Bob Bauder
This alligator was captured in May along the Monongahela River in Pittsburgh’s South Side.

Reptile owners in Pittsburgh would have to register their alligators and snakes with the city under legislation City Council proposed on Monday.

The bill introduced by Councilwoman Darlene Harris, an avowed animal lover from Spring Hill, would also require owners to keep reptiles in secure cages and rooms and post notices to let people know the animals are inside.

A first offense could result in a fine of $300 for each creature. Repeat violators could be assessed a fine of $1,000 per reptile, according to the legislation.

Harris said she began working on the bill before alligators started showing up around the city this year, but those events confirmed regulations are needed.

“It’s a safety issue,” she said. “If say fire, paramedics or police have to get into a place, and something happens where they get out, and they’re either in the house or a neighborhood, someone could be killed.”

At least four alligators — ranging in size from 2.5 feet to 5 feet long — were captured between May and October along the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers and streets in Beechview and Carrick. As of October, at least seven gators had been dropped off at Humane Animal Rescue’s East End location.

“We encouraged the need for this type of legislation here in the city,” said Dan Rossi, Humane Animal Rescue’s CEO. “The biggest reason is these aren’t animals that should be held in people’s homes or unnatural captivity. You can buy these guys at reptile shows for around $110, and they’re a foot, foot and a half long, but eventually they’re going to get bigger, and bigger, and bigger. People don’t have the housing for these animals.”

Rossi said the problem is twofold: The animals are treated inhumanely and it’s dangerous for humans when they are released or escape.

“We’ve been very lucky so far that nobody has been hurt, but as they proliferate and get out there, at some point somebody’s cat or dog, or a person, is going to be hurt by these animals,” he said. “We’re looking at what is humane for an animal and safe for the city of Pittsburgh.”

Under the legislation, owners would have to provide the city’s Animal Care and Control Department with a list of each reptile they own. They must keep the animals in escape-proof containers and rooms.

Owners would have to post notice on each container that a reptile is inside. Entrances to rooms and buildings housing the animals must also be posted with notice that they contain regulated reptiles.

The legislation requires reptile owners and exhibitors to transport them in escape-proof containers. Exhibitors must notify the city at least 48 hours in advance of an event.

Harris, whose term ends in December, said she wants to ensure that animal officers are property trained and equipped to deal with exotic animals.

“Whether it’s research, whether it’s a hospital, whether it’s a home or business, they need to keep tabs on these animals and secure them from getting out anywhere in the city of Pittsburgh,” Harris said.

Council is expected to schedule discussion and a preliminary vote for Dec. 4. Tim McNulty, spokesman for Mayor Bill Peduto, said the mayor only received the bill Monday and would review it before deciding if he will support it.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-564-3080, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.