Pittsburgh outranks Honolulu in 2019 Condé Nast Traveler survey | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh outranks Honolulu in 2019 Condé Nast Traveler survey

Natasha Lindstrom
The city of Pittsburgh skyline.

The beaches, sunsets and volcanic rainforest hikes of Honolulu apparently aren’t as appealing to travelers as the pierogies, beers and foodie paradise of Pittsburgh, a magazine reader’s survey found.

Condé Nast Traveler published its rankings of the best small and large cities to visit in the United States with its 2019 Readers’ Choice Awards, which are based on travel ratings submitted by more than 600,000 people from around the world.

Pittsburgh ranked No. 8 of the Top 10 large cities.

The magazine cited the Pittsburgh’s wealth of arts, cultural and historical institutions. The magazine included checking out the original Misters Rogers’ Neighborhood set at Heinz History Center and the city’s burgeoning dining scene “that involves way more than slapping fries on everything (though we recommend that, too).”

The city scored extra points for its high concentration of bars and breweries.

“You could spend a whole weekend brewery-hopping — there are at least 20 within city limits,” the magazine wrote about Pittsburgh, suggesting that newcomers start with a stroll through the city’s Strip District and a bite at Gaucho Parilla Argentina or DiAnoia’s Eatery.

Chicago clinched first place on the Condé Nast Traveler rankings, followed by Minneapolis, Boston and New Orleans.

Hawaii’s capital still made the list, at No. 9, sliding in right after Pittsburgh and just ahead of San Antonio.

Here are the top 10 large cities, per the 2019 Readers Choice Awards:

1). Chicago

2). Minneapolis

3). Boston

4). New Orleans

5). Washington D.C.

6). San Diego

7) New York

8) Pittsburgh

9) Honolulu

10). San Antonio

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.