Pittsburgh poised to pay woman $52,500 to settle negligence lawsuit | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh poised to pay woman $52,500 to settle negligence lawsuit

Bob Bauder
1364234_web1_web-courts9
Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh is poised to pay a Crafton Heights woman $52,500 to settle a lawsuit alleging an Emergency Medical Services official was reckless when he struck her with a city vehicle in 2013. Pittsburgh is poised to pay a Crafton Heights woman $52,500 to settle a lawsuit alleging an Emergency Medical Services official was reckless when he struck her with a city vehicle in 2013.

Pittsburgh would pay a West End woman $52,500 to settle a lawsuit she filed in 2014 contending an EMS official struck her with a city vehicle as she was crossing a street in Brighton Heights.

Jennifer Batten, 36, of Crafton Heights said in a complaint that she was in a crosswalk on Sept. 11, 2013, on Brighton Heights Boulevard when District Chief Richard Linn Jr. failed to yield and struck her with an EMS vehicle as he was speeding through the intersection.

Batten suffered severe injuries, including broken bones, a concussion and muscle damages, when she was thrown to the ground and rolled along the street, according to the complaint.

Public safety spokeswoman Cara Cruz declined comment as did Patrick W. Murray, one of Batten’s attorneys.

Batten alleges that Linn was reckless and negligent. She was seeking damages in excess of $35,000.

Pittsburgh City Council introduced a resolution on Tuesday that would authorize payment of $52,500. Council is scheduled to vote on the settlement in coming weeks.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.