Pittsburgh Police: Sheraden woman assaulted by pair who tried to steal her dog | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh Police: Sheraden woman assaulted by pair who tried to steal her dog

Natasha Lindstrom

A Sheraden woman was assaulted Friday afternoon by people who came to her door and attempted to steal her dog, initial reports indicate.

Pittsburgh Police arrested two suspects involved in the incident, Public Safety spokeswoman Cara Cruz said. A third adult accompanying the accused pair was not charged.

The woman who was injured, whose name was not released, told police that she was talking on the phone to a friend when three people showed up at the front door of her home on Zephyr Avenue, near Hammond Street.

They said they had lost their dog and insisted that the woman had it, police said.

“The victim denied it was theirs and refused to give up the dog,” Cruz said.

At least one of the people began hitting her, the woman told police. They struck her in the face, then took the dog using force, and headed back to their vehicle.

The woman began to chase after them. She later told police she saw that one of them had a gun.

Meanwhile, the friend whom she had been talking to heard the commotion and had dialed 911.

Police already in the area managed to stop the suspects’ vehicle less than 100 feet from the injured woman’s home, Cruz said.

Officers arrested a man and a woman, and each face multiple charges, Cruz said.

Police did not immediately identify them nor specify their charges.

“The third adult was not arrested and is believed to have been trying to break up the fight,” Cruz said.

Medics took the woman who was assaulted to a nearby hospital, where she was in stable condition.

She was treated for a cut above her eye, police said.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.