Pittsburgh police use ladder to rescue woman held hostage during domestic | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh police use ladder to rescue woman held hostage during domestic

Bob Bauder
Pittsburgh police used a ladder Saturday to rescue a woman from a second-floor window during a domestic dispute in the Brighton Heights neighborhood.

Pittsburgh police used a ladder Saturday afternoon to rescue a woman who was being held hostage by her boyfriend in a Brighton Heights house, according to the Public Safety Department.

Officers pulled the woman, who was not identified, from a second-floor window.

Marc Vrane, 47, assaulted the woman and refused to let her leave, police said. Officers responded to the house in the 4000 block of Brandon Road around 1:15 p.m and used a ladder from a city fire truck to reach the woman

Vrane barricaded himself inside the home and threatened police multiple times while refusing to come out, according to the Public Safety Department.

SWAT officers entered the house and used tear gas and a K-9 officer to take Vrane into custody without incident around 3:50 p.m.

Vrane was charged with aggravated assault, strangulation, unlawful restraint, terroristic threats and reckless endangerment. Police anticipate filing additional charges after obtaining a search warrant.

The woman was treated at the scene for bruises. Vrane was taken to a local hospital for evaluation before being transported to the Allegheny County Jail.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-564-3080, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.