Pittsburgh ranks 15th among best cities in nation to retire | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh ranks 15th among best cities in nation to retire

Nicole C. Brambila
1717208_web1_ptr-PittsburghSkyline3-2019
Better than the 16th-best place to retire. Pittsburgh’s skyline and the Fort Pitt Bridge. Oct. 1, 2019.

Pittsburgh makes a lot of lists — the best cities for its Oktoberfest, for coffee drinkers and to celebrate the Fourth of July. It even made the top three for the best Rust Belt comeback story. Yet as a retiree destination, it rarely outshines Sun Belt locales.

But in a new list, the Steel City can brag it’s the 15th best city to retire.

The ranking comes from Chamber of Commerce, a digital research firm that helps small businesses and entrepreneurs (not affiliated with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce). It examined more than 4,100 cities, or those with a population of 10,000 or more. Only four Pennsylvania cities made the top 100. None came close to Pittsburgh. The 2019 list from Chamber of Commerce ranked Scranton (39), Philadelphia (42) and Erie (56).

No. 1 on the list was New Bedford, Mass., for its small-town feel and coastal climate. Massachusetts claimed for four spots in the top 10.

With the average retiree living expenses costing $46,000 a year, and the retirement age getting pushed back every year, selecting an affordable place to live out one’s golden years is going to become more important as baby boomers leave the workforce.

The organization’s ranking looked at a number of indicators, including the percentage of the population 65 and older, poverty rate, median housing costs and the rate of physicians, crime and police officers per 100,000 population.

To read the full report, click here.

Nicole C. Brambila is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Nicole at 724-226-7704, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.