Pittsburgh seeking the return of historical documents | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh seeking the return of historical documents

Bob Bauder
1753351_web1_Hartley
Bob Bauder | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Archivist Nick Hartley with historical artifacts related to Adam Mercer Brown, who served as city “recorder,” the official title for mayor, in 1901.The items were donated to the city by J.B. Meanor of North Carolina, a descendant of Brown’s.
1753351_web1_Brown-House
The Bloomfield home of Adam Mercer Brown. The house, which sat at the corner of Liberty Avenue and Conrad Street, now South Pacific Avenue, was later demolished.
1753351_web1_Brown-and-Wife
Adam Mercer Brown (left), who served as Pittsburgh mayor, under the official title of “recorder,” for about six months in 1901. At right is his wife, Lucetta.
1753351_web1_Oath

A North Carolina family’s donation of historical documents related to one of Pittsburgh’s early mayors inspired the current mayor’s office to issue a public plea this week: Help us locate archival treasures that might have “walked off” from City Hall over the last 200 years.

James Hill, special assistant to Mayor Bill Peduto, said he and historical archivist Nick Hartley hope to recover anything related to the city, including maps, blueprints and historical records.

“There are a lot of things that we suspect have walked off over the course of a century,” Hill said. “It’d be hard to specify anything in particular that we’re looking for. But pretty much if it’s stamped by the city of Pittsburgh or looks like it was a part of our history, we’d like to have the opportunity to have it back home.”

J.B. Meanor of North Carolina donated the original oath of office and a proclamation from Pennsylvania Gov. William A. Stone appointing Adam Mercer Brown city recorder in 1901. Meanor is a descendant of Brown.

The term “recorder” at that time was used as the official title for the city’s top executive. Brown served for less than one year.

The documents, which include photographs of Brown and his wife and their home in Bloomfield, had been handed down in the family for generations. Hartley said Meanor donated them in honor of his father.

“They on their own accord reached out to (Hartley) and turned in these artifacts,” Hill said. “We thought if these people had this, who knows what else is out there in other peoples’ attics, garages and so forth. We thought it would be a really cool opportunity to bring a lot of those materials back home to the city.”

Hartley said the city has a spotty record of maintaining the official documents of past mayoral administrations. The city until recently also had no policy for retaining and preserving historic documents.

“When an administration exited office, they likely threw away their records or took them with them,” Hartley said.

Pittsburgh in 2017 recovered meeting minutes from Pittsburgh’s first years as a city, 1794-1803. Someone walked off with the leather-bound volume around 1895. It was sold in 1912 for $150 to the Pennsylvania Historical Society, which returned it to the city.

The Holy Grail is a city map entitled “Survey and Town Plan of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,” created in 1784 by Col. George Woods. Woods laid out the first plan of city streets that are still being used in the Golden Triangle. Only one of the maps is known to exist. It’s in private hands after being sold at auction several times, according to Gloria Forouzan, the Mayor’s Office manager.

“Where is it? I don’t know, but we’d like to find out,” she said.

Hartley said the city hopes to digitize and post records online.

Anyone wishing to donate records to the city can contact Hartley by email at [email protected] or phone at 412-255-0873.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.