Pittsburgh Symphony makes big financial progress | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh Symphony makes big financial progress

Mark Kanny
Tribune-Review file
Overflow fans wait for tickets before a 2017 Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra performance.
Courtesy of Pittsburgh Symphony
Pittsburgh Symphony president and CEO Melia Tourgeau Pittsburgh Symphony president and CEO Melia Tourgeau

The Pittsburgh Symphony has progressed on its long path to financial health by posting a $1.1 million surplus in its operating budget for the 2018-19 season.

The season concluded at the end of August.

That’s a big turnaround for an organization that’s been running in the red for most of the past decade.

The operating budget is a crucial measure of how the organization is functioning, akin to a family’s monthly budget, which tracks income and expenditures. But it doesn’t tell the whole story. The symphony has a big liability hanging over its head in the form of its pension fund.

The symphony will need to put $3 million in cash into the pension fund during the new season, and has $21 million in unfunded pension fund liability.

“It’s like if you have a huge credit card balance and don’t have the money in the bank to pay for it,” symphony President Melia Tourangeau said.

It took three years after Tourangeau became president in 2015 for the symphony to reach a surplus. It was $86,000 in the black for the 2017-18 season. The symphony often had run with annual multimillion-dollar deficits since the 2007-08 season.

The progress was accomplished by limiting growth in expenses to a much smaller amount over four years — $537,000 — than the rise in income it achieved, $3 million.

Growth in expenses mainly was held down by concessions the musicians made in a contract signed at the end of their strike in the fall of 2016 and by staff restructuring in 2016-17. The symphony and musicians will negotiate a new contract in 2021.

“Unfortunately, we had to go through difficult contract negotiations with the musicians,” Tourangeau said. “But that allowed us about three years of runway to rebuild the confidence of the community, focus on building the reliable fundraising that we needed, and going to the state and county and lobbying for additional resources.”

Although some of the increased revenue came from modestly increasing ticket sales, most of it was from donated income — growth in the annual support from the public and from members of the board of trustees, and from foundation and government funding.

But the pension fund challenge remains, although symphony musicians and staff are now on 401k plans. The pension was “hard frozen” on Aug. 31, meaning no additional pension benefits will accrue. But the symphony’s existing pension liability will vary from year to year, with changes in interest rates an important factor in annual calculations.

Tourangeau said the symphony is “hyper-focused” on the pension because, if the problem isn’t solved, the progress of the past four years could be swamped.

“We’re in really high-level conversations with important people in the city who can help us. That’s all I can say right now,” she said. “It’s going to be an ongoing issue to manage, not something that can be solved with one big check. It’s really, really complicated.”

Mark Kanny is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.