ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh tax preparer pleads guilty to filing $1.5 million in false returns | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh tax preparer pleads guilty to filing $1.5 million in false returns

Chuck Biedka
1111030_web1_GavelNewN

A Clairton man pleaded guilty in Pittsburgh federal court to aiding or assisting in the preparation of filing false federal tax returns.

Quincy K. Denson of Clairton pleaded guilty to two counts before U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer.

In connection with the guilty plea, Denson, while a tax preparer at Cititax Tax Refund in Pittsburgh, prepared false federal income tax returns for other persons that included false Schedule C information, and which requested a false tax refund for the taxpayer, the government said.

Between 2010 and 2015, Denson is accused of filing about 501 false personal tax returns of which approximately 343 returns contained Schedule C attachments. The Schedule C attachments collectively requested approximately $1.5 million in Earned Income Tax Credits for the taxpayers, the government said.

Judge Fischer scheduled sentencing for Oct. 3.

The law provides for a total sentence of 3 years imprisonment for each count, a fine of $250,000.00 or both. The sentence will depend on any prior records and seriousness of the crime.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Gregory C. Melucci is prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.

The Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation conducted the investigation.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.