Pittsburgh updating rules for collection of garbage, recyclables | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh updating rules for collection of garbage, recyclables

Bob Bauder
837417_web1_php-recyclingrules1
Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh residents would have new rules to follow for recycling and garbage collections under legislation proposed by City Council.

Pittsburgh residents could have some new rules to follow for recycling and garbage collections under legislation proposed Tuesday by City Council.

Councilwoman Erika Strassburger of Squirrel Hill, who sponsored the legislation, said current regulations set in 2005 were outdated and officials wanted to update and include them in the city’s code of ordinances.

Property owners can be cited for failure to abide by them. She reminded residents that recycling in the city is mandatory.

“The law was outdated and there were some parts that just hadn’t kept pace with current practices of Environmental Services so we wanted to codify the practices that were already being implemented by Environmental Services for waste and recycling,” Strassburger said. “Ultimately, we want to encourage more recycling and cut down on the amount of waste going into landfills.”

Under the bill, the city would have authority to cite renters along with property owners for repeated rule violations. It also requires landlords with less than six rental units at a single property to provide tenants with garbage and recycling containers.

“I think that’s one of the biggest things that people will notice,” Strassburger said.

The bill also:

  • Requires residents to store garbage and recyclables in durable watertight containers with a lid. Garbage bags and cans can be left at curbside on the day before a collection, but no earlier than 6 p.m. and no later than 6 a.m. on a collection day. Empty containers must be removed from curbside by 7 p.m. on collection day.
  • Prohibits storage of garbage in blue bags issued for recycled materials.
  • Requires landlords with more than 5 units to hire their own trash and recycling hauler.

Environmental Services foremen have authority to issue citations if necessary. Fines can range from $50 to $100 for a first citation and up to $500 for repeat violations.

Strassburger said foremen mainly rely on complaints from neighbors. They won’t likely be driving around neighborhoods checking to make sure garbage cans are out and removed at the correct times and will be lenient for first-time offenders, she said.

“There’s a process,” she said. “The first time it’s a warning. The second time, they’ll cite.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.