Pittsburgh voters approve 0.5-mill tax increase to fund city parks | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh voters approve 0.5-mill tax increase to fund city parks

Bob Bauder
1904054_web1_ptr-alleghenycommons-FILE
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
The West Park section of Allegheny Commons in Pittsburgh’s North Side.
1904054_web1_Spray-PArk
Tribune-Review
A child cools off at a spray park in Pittsburgh’s Troy Hill neighborhood.

Pittsburgh voters on Tuesday approved a ballot referendum that will result in a 0.5-mill property tax increase next year to generate money for improvements in city parks.

With 392 of 402 precincts reporting, the referendum passed with 51.6% of votes counted, according to unofficial Allegheny County election results.

Jayne Miller, president and CEO of the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy, which spearheaded the initiative with Mayor Bill Peduto’s support, noted that the referendum received a majority of yes votes in seven of nine Pittsburgh City Council districts.

“I think this is more than just Pittsburgh parks,” Miller said. “I think this will improve the quality of life for every Pittsburgher in every neighborhood.”

The conservancy has said city parks face a $400 million funding gap in deferred maintenance and improvements and an annual $13 million shortfall in maintenance funds each year.

The tax increase will cost property owners $50 for every $100,000 of assessed value and is expected to raise about $10 million annually. The conservancy promised to match that with private foundation funding.

Miller said the goal is to raise $20 million annually.

The money will be held by the city in a trust fund to be used exclusively for park maintenance, capital projects, repairs and programming.

“The next steps now for us is to work with the city to negotiate an agreement for what role we will have in implementing this plan in partnership with the city,” Miller said.

Critics, including city Controller Michael Lamb and several council members, have called the campaign a backdoor tax that will overburden city residents. They suggested that the city fund park improvements with annual budget surplus money and seek payments from large tax-exempt nonprofits.

Peduto has said the city’s annual capital budget cannot fund the needed improvements in parks and playgrounds that have been neglected for years. The mayor has promised a park within a 10-minute walk of every home in the city and that the funding would make Pittsburgh a highly desirable destination for new residents.

Peduto’s Chief of Staff Dan Gilman tweeted that the referendum was a win for city children.

The city has 165 parks, including the Emerald, Frick, Highland, Riverview and Schenley regional parks that receive annual funding from the Allegheny Regional Asset District. RAD funding comes from one-half of the proceeds from the 1% sales tax in Allegheny County, collected in addition to the 6% state sales tax.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-564-3080, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.