Pittsburgh woman charged with kidnapping baby | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh woman charged with kidnapping baby

Jacob Tierney
1071250_web1_web-handcuffs_dark

A woman kidnapped a baby from a Homewood home Wednesday night, according to court paperwork filed by Pittsburgh police.

Police quickly found the 1-year-old girl and arrested the accused kidnapper, Nayshell Sly, 27, of Pittsburgh.

The abduction was reported around 8 p.m. Thursday.

A babysitter told police that Sly had been repeatedly calling her, asking to take the child despite being repeatedly told she could not.

Police did not

The babysitter went to the store, leaving her 14-year-old daughter in charge of he baby, the affidavit said.

That’s when Sly allegedly came to the home and took the baby.

Police were able to track Sly’s phone and pulled over her SUV on the Birmingham Bridge before 9:30 p.m.

There were two adults and four children in the vehicle, including the baby girl.

The baby was taken to the hospital to be checked but was in good health, according to police.

The baby’s mother told police that Sly did not have permission to take the child, according to the affidavit.

Sly is charged with kidnapping, burglary and interference with custody of children.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled for May 8.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.