Pittsburgh woman claims arrest came for not supporting Trump | TribLIVE.com
Politics Election

Pittsburgh woman claims arrest came for not supporting Trump

Bob Bauder
1104396_web1_PoliceLightsZ

A North Side woman said a Pittsburgh police officer charged her with burglary and other crimes in 2017 because she she didn’t support Donald Trump.

Darian Balcom, 47, of Perry North, sued the city in federal court Tuesday, contending Officer Gabe Figueroa violated her First Amendment Rights.

“The essence of this is that a law enforcement officer should not be allowing his own political beliefs to influence his official duties,” said Downtown attorney Margaret Coleman, who represents Balcom. “He was there to investigate a crime. She should have been free to tell him what she thought about his behavior and the president of the United States.”

Pittsburgh Public Safety Department spokesman Chris Togneri declined comment, citing the pending lawsuit.

Balcom said the incident unfolded on Dec. 18, 2017, when the owner of a nearby apartment building asked her to feed dogs left behind in a vacant apartment. Balcom said she and friend Matthew Grebner went to the apartment and found the dogs and several cats that had been abandoned in the building.

Another neighbor called police and reported a burglary after seeing Balcom and Grebner leaving the apartment with the cats.

“The easiest thing was to take the cats to my building, so we carried them there,” Balcom said. “Five police officers showed up. Officer Figueroa asked a couple of questions that weren’t investigation related. He didn’t ask me what was going on. He did not ask me why we had removed the cats. He called me sweetheart, and I said, ‘Don’t call me sweetheart.’”

According to the lawsuit, Figueroa asked her if she supported Trump for president. When she told him no, he said he was a Trump supporter and arrested her, according to the lawsuit.

Grebner, 56, of Spring Hill, said Figueroa released him and told him while unlocking handcuffs that Balcom didn’t do anything wrong, but she shouldn’t sass a police officer.

“He said, ‘She’s just a bleeding heart liberal trying to take care of some animals, and she shouldn’t sass,’” Grebner said.

Balcom said she spent the night in Allegheny County jail and three months with “felony charges hanging over my head.” The charges were withdrawn in March 2018.

“I thought I was being very cooperative,” Balcom said. “I just wanted to answer his questions. If what I had done was a crime, (Grebner) should had been arrested as well. He and I had done the same thing.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.