Pittsburgh set to spend $407K to design upgrades for fire stations | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh set to spend $407K to design upgrades for fire stations

Bob Bauder
Pittsburgh Fire Bureau
Pittsburgh plans to spend $407,000 for design work on renovations to six dilapidated fire stations. Pittsburgh plans to spend $407,000 for design work needed for renovations to six dilapidated fire stations.

Pittsburgh is set to spend $407,000 for design work on six fire stations scheduled for remodeling in 2020, according to the Mayor’s Office.

City Council will introduce legislation on Tuesday to approve the funding.

Unions representing fire, police and paramedics have complained for years about problems at stations, including sinkholes, leaking roofs and sewage backups. The city for years neglected maintenance on its buildings because of financial constraints.

Massaro Construction Management Services assessed about 300 city structures in 2015 and estimated it would cost about $60 million to repair them all.

Mayor Bill Peduto budgeted nearly $11 million in 2019 for facility repairs, including $3.9 million for public safety.

Renovations at the six fire stations would include improved bunk rooms, toilets, showers, locker rooms, kitchens, utilities and accommodations for disabled people.

The city plans renovations at Stations 19 in Swisshelm Park, 23 in Carrick, 26 in Brookline, 34 in Perry North, 35 in Brighton Heights and 38 in Northview Heights.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.