Pittsburgh’s Grandview Avenue getting speed bumps to slow traffic | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh’s Grandview Avenue getting speed bumps to slow traffic

Bob Bauder
Pittsburgh’s Grandview Avenue on Mt. Washington.

A drive along Pittsburgh’s Grandview Avenue in Mt. Washington is going to be a little bumpy over the next few months.

The Department of Mobility and Infrastructure announced Friday that the city would temporarily install rubber speed humps and improve pavement markings along Grandview, a popular destination overlooking Downtown, to discourage speeding and improve pedestrian safety.

Testing in 2018 indicated that 61% of drivers exceeded the 25 mph speed limit. The city is installing five humps between Bertha and Shiloh streets for two months to see if they slow motorists down. DOMI will use speed data collected over the two months to determine if the humps should be permanent fixtures.

Traffic will be restricted for about five days during the painting of pavement markings. Work is expected to begin on Monday and includes high-visibility crosswalks.

Pittsburgh in June closed sidewalks along the street for emergency sidewalk repairs. The Mayor’s Office allocated $800,000 for sidewalks that are expected to be finished by November. The city also is seeking $1.8 million from the state for comprehensive improvement to the landmark street that features scenic views of the city and its rivers.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.