Pleasant Hills man gets up to 6 years in prison for fatal DUI crash |

Pleasant Hills man gets up to 6 years in prison for fatal DUI crash

Megan Guza

A Pleasant Hills man pleaded guilty Monday to homicide by vehicle in exchange for prosecutors withdrawing a charge of involuntary manslaughter, according to the District Attorney’s Office.

Andrew Lannon, 31, also pleaded guilty to driving under the influence and homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence. The plea agreement included a sentence of three to six years in prison followed by four years of probation.

Lannon was charged in the Sept. 1 death of Sangeen Khan on River Road in Baldwin Borough, according to the criminal complaint against him.

The incident began moments earlier when Lannon allegedly rear-ended a Z Trip cab stopped at a traffic light at the intersection of East Carson Street and Becks Run Road. Medics responded to the fender bender and saw Lannon take off in his silver Jeep Liberty, police said.

Medics followed, trying to get a license plate, police said, and witnessed the Jeep drive into the opposing lane to pass another vehicle. Moments later, according to the complaint, they came upon the head-on crash between Lannon’s Jeep and Khan’s Toyota Prius.

Khan was pronounced dead at the scene.

Medics at the scene told police they could smell alcohol on Lannon, who had also told police he “had a couple of drinks right after work and just prior to the collision,” according to the complaint. His blood-alcohol level was later found to be 0.213% — more than twice the legal limit.

Detectives also determined Lannon was driving at about 80 mph just before the crash.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.