Police: Gun found under Antwon Rose’s seat was stolen in Rankin | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Police: Gun found under Antwon Rose’s seat was stolen in Rankin

Dillon Carr
1522339_web1_PTR-Rosfeld01-20190321
Tribune-Review
A memorial to Antwon Rose II is seen outside of the Allegheny County Courthouse during the homicide trial of former East Pittsburgh Police officer Michael Rosfeld on Thursday, March 21, 2019. Rosfeld was acquitted.

A handgun found in the car from which Antwon Rose II ran before an East Pittsburgh police officer shot and killed him was stolen, according to investigators.

The gun was originally reported stolen out of Monroeville, but county police later determined it was stolen in Rankin, Allegheny County police Inspector Andrew Schurman wrote in an email to the Tribune-Review.

It was one of two guns recovered from the Chevy Cruze suspected to be involved in a June 19, 2018, drive-by shooting in North Braddock. Former East Pittsburgh officer Michael Rosfeld stopped the car. Rose and Zaijuan Hester, both passengers in the car, ran. Rosfeld shot and killed Rose.

A jury acquitted Rosfeld of homicide in March after a four-day trial.

During the investigation that followed both shootings, police found two guns in the car, according to a criminal complaint filed in the case.

There was a 9mm Glock model 26 pistol under the the front passenger seat. It was loaded with a 17-round magazine that contained 16 rounds. Police said they found an empty magazine in Rose’s pocket that matched the 9mm pistol found in the car used in the drive-by shooting.

A witness who lived near where the police-involved shooting happened told investigators that Rose got out of the front passenger seat and put his hands on the roof of the car before turning to run away.

The other gun was a .40-caliber Glock 22 pistol that was found under the rear portion of the front passenger seat with a live round in the chamber and an extended magazine with 18 rounds.

Shell casings found at the scene of the North Braddock drive-by matched the .40-caliber Glock 22 pistol, police said.

Hester, who was 17 at the time of the crime, pleaded guilty to charges related to the drive-by shooting in North Braddock.

Rosfeld’s defense attorney, Patrick Thomassey, wanted to bring up details surrounding the stolen 9mm pistol during Rosfeld’s trial, including allegations that Rose stole the weapon during a robbery.

Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Alexander Bicket said details of the alleged robbery would not be allowed during trial unless he said otherwise.

Schurman did not offer any other details including when or where the gun was stolen. He also did not answer questions such as who owned the gun or if Hester or Rose were ever considered as suspects for the theft.

Monroeville police Chief Doug Cole said a report of a “lost or misplaced” 9mm Glock came to his department on June 20, a day after the shooting of Rose. He declined to offer additional details because he said the document could still be involved in an investigation.

“I don’t want to talk about how (the gun) was stolen,” Cole said.

When asked for a copy of the original report, Cole deferred to the Allegheny County Police Department because it handled the investigation that followed the shootings.

Schurman declined to release the document without providing a reason.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.