Police: Man pulled gun on 2 women in suspected road rage incident outside Rivers Casino | TribLIVE.com

Police: Man pulled gun on 2 women in suspected road rage incident outside Rivers Casino

Natasha Lindstrom

A North Side man apparently fueled by road rage is accused of chasing after and pulling an AK-style gun on two women early Wednesday outside the Rivers Casino parking garage.

Jamal Dailey, 24, faces several charges tied to an incident that began while driving in his home neighborhood of Manchester and culminated with a confrontation near the casino observed by a Pittsburgh police officer patrolling the area, a criminal complaint shows.

The officer was sitting behind the casino’s parking lot shortly before 1:30 a.m. when he spotted a white Hyundai SUV traveling toward the garage at a high speed followed by a black Chevrolet Cruze, the complaint said.

When the cars stopped for a red light at Reedsdale and Lighthill streets, the officer saw a man — later identified as Dailey — jump out of the Chevrolet Cruze while holding a gun, the complaint said. Dailey headed toward the driver’s side door of the SUV, which was occupied by two women.

“You got a gun?” the officer heard one of the women shout as he unlocked his patrol rifle.

A confrontation ensued in which the women got out of their vehicle and started yelling at Dailey, the complaint said. The officer approached Dailey with his rifle and ordered him to drop to the ground.

While in the back seat of a patrol car, Dailey gave police his side of the story: The women’s vehicle had sideswiped his car in Manchester, striking his front driver side’s wheel.

Dailey said he then followed the women at a close distance for about a mile to “obtain their information.”

He told police he pulled out his gun for protection.

Police found a single 9 mm live round next to the driver’s side of the SUV.

The gun still contained a live round in the chamber cleared by police, which made police believe that Dailey “chambered another round into the firearm in an attempt to further place the victims in fear for their lives,” the complaint said.

Dailey initially told police that he had not racked a round outside his car, then admitted to doing so when police told him they had found a round there.

“He claimed he racked the round out, ejecting it onto the ground, making the weapon safe,” the complaint said.

Dailey has a valid concealed carry permit for the gun, police said. It’s a PAK-9 AK pistol that had been modified to be used with two hands like a rifle.

Police pointed out in the complaint that Dailey had a working cell phone and “was more than capable of calling 911 to alert police of the hit-and-run.”

When an officer told him “that he should have called the cops to investigate, he couldn’t comprehend that what he had done was irrational and reckless,” police wrote in the complaint.

As for Dailey’s vehicle, police said they observed “very minor damage, which officers could not determine to be old or fresh at the time.”

A pair of officers took Dailey to Allegheny County Jail while another officer headed inside the casino to review surveillance footage that police say corroborates the responding officer’s observations.

Dailey faces charges including simple assault, recklessly endangering another person and using an instrument of crime, court records show.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected]eb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.